审稿人要求重写，大家觉得有戏么？

　　审稿人要求重写，大家觉得有戏么？。本人菜鸟，第一次写SCI，投了个，审稿人意思说我这篇文章主题不清，要求重写！请大家给点意见
论文旨是对新结构振动筛动力学研究新算法。
Dear Authors,

Your manuscript:

**********

Please find the review report(s) below:

This is a rather well written paper. Unfortunately, there are many points
which do prevent a positive recommendation.

The first problem is related to the general aim of this manuscript. What
message do authors wish to transmit to the International audience of the
Journal?

The fact that they did use three kinds of dynamics simulation
models? This does not sound seriously.

If it was a new construction of the vibratory screen, vibration
transporter or sorter – that could be ok. What is the point of this study
now?

The second problem is that vibratory screens is a classical research
object. Such systems had been widely investigated (maybe in little other
context – line vibratory conveyors) at the middle of the -th Century.
What new knowledge does this paper contributed to the state in the art in
the field? The answer to this question is completely unclear.

Yes, authors so use modern computation tools – FEM modal analysis for
example. But again – what is the point? Did they propose a new
construction? Is it superior to what is used nowadays? Answers are
unclear.

If authors would wish to revise their paper – it should be a very serious
in-depth revision. In fact, the paper should be rewritten. Then it could
be possibly reconsidered.
===有问必答===


2楼2014-03-23 21:41:47
----
very seriousin-depth

用的都是猛词，一般出现一个就够冒汗的了，三个都给你了。好自为之吧