这样的审稿意见，应该怎样应对（拒稿重投，有一个审稿人问的问题硬伤）

　　这样的审稿意见，应该怎样应对（拒稿重投，有一个审稿人问的问题硬伤）。Dear Dr. :Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in the American Chemical Society journal Inorganic Chemistry.It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed.Reviewer 2 has have expressed serious reservations and made suggestions for further experiments that I dont believe could be addressed through a standard major revision.In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Inorganic Chemistry.However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that included such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revision should address the reviewers comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns.I am sorry to have to convey this negative decision to you.Nevertheless, we appreciate your choice of Inorganic Chemistry as a possible forum for the presentation of your work.
===有问必答===


2楼2017-04-19 21:08:01
----
修后重投，如果是大牛的，给这个已经很不容易了。


----

别担心，总会中的。我之前也被拒过无数次，感觉永远都中不了，就是一个过程，挺过去就好了，加油！


----

已没有一点力气了，祈福这次能中，这次再被拒都不知怎么办了！
----
加油！其实从总结数据开始写，到不停修改，再到最后的，都是一个很波折的过程，我的还没投不过也是。只要迈出投出去的这一步，文章最后总会有着落的。保持好的心态，向前看。
----
简单回复 blueskine5楼 2017-04-19 23:53 回复 EAST_黄土地(金币+1): 谢谢参与 顶 wdxmu6楼 2017-04-19 23:55 回复 EAST_黄土地(金币+1): 谢谢参与 一 as125897楼 2017-04-20 00:43 回复 EAST_黄土地(金币+1): 谢谢参与 祝福 今夜不眠9楼 2017-04-20 02:48 回复 EAST_黄土地(金币+1): 谢谢参与 ，， xuechenli10楼 2017-04-20 05:32 回复 EAST_黄土地(金币+1): 谢谢参与 好