optics express编辑的意见,在思考怎么response

2020-07-27本站

  optics express编辑的意见,在思考怎么response。Editor Comment:
Both reviewers find the contribution of the paper incremental.
In particular, Reviewer 1 has serious concern about the novelty against [31]. I therefore request the authors to make a thorough justification of their novelty compared to these two papers.
Reviewer 2 has listed a lot of detailed problems of the paper. This indicates to me that the paper must go through a very careful proof-reading.

看来一定要reviewer了
===有问必答===
简单回复 纳米材料7532楼 2017-04-12 16:52 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 blueskine3楼 2017-04-12 16:56 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 numerical6楼 2017-04-12 17:03 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 xiaoqiuqiu207楼 2017-04-12 17:11 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 龙浅8楼 2017-04-12 17:14 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 ^_^ pandongzi9楼 2017-04-12 17:16 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 paperhunter12楼 2017-04-12 17:18 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 glin0813楼 2017-04-12 17:18 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 祝福 jufayin14楼 2017-04-12 17:20 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 超级老快15楼 2017-04-12 17:23 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 龙飞哥17楼 2017-04-12 17:28 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 祝福 dsctg18楼 2017-04-12 17:29 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 yaoyao14519楼 2017-04-12 17:39 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 y peiqingsong20楼 2017-04-12 17:43 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 祝 sesame_oil21楼 2017-04-12 17:43 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 xhmaohan22楼 2017-04-12 17:44 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 激荡风雷23楼 2017-04-12 17:47 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 顶 liujunhero24楼 2017-04-12 17:48 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 祝福 zhaoyan197825楼 2017-04-12 17:51 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 nancy_wjj26楼 2017-04-12 17:59 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 as1258927楼 2017-04-12 18:07 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 祝福 下载28楼 2017-04-12 18:14 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与 。。 spc0829楼 2017-04-12 18:17 回复 xsw1EZUNo425(金币+2): 谢谢参与

留言与评论(共有 0 条评论)
   
验证码:

搜索

图文推荐